Vet Tech salary

Pasadena vs San Francisco: Veterinary Technologist and Technician Salary (2026)

Compare veterinary technologist and technician salaries between Pasadena, CA and San Francisco, CA. All figures are 2026 estimates projected from BLS 2025 data.

Pasadena, CA
$63,107
$30.34/hr
San Francisco, CA
$75,000
$36.06/hr

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPasadena, CASan Francisco, CA
Median Salary$63,107$75,000
Hourly Rate$30.34$36.06
Entry Level (P10)$47,300$57,054
25th Percentile$51,354$64,038
75th Percentile$78,777$78,513
Top Earner (P90)$87,097$84,326
Total Employed351,220
Side-by-side bar chart comparing Pasadena ($63,107) and San Francisco ($75,000) veterinary technologist and technician salaries.PasadenaSan FranciscoMedian Salary$63,107$75,000Entry Level (P10)$47,300$57,054Top Earner (P90)$87,097$84,326US Median $49,986

Verdict

San Francisco, CA offers better overall compensation for veterinary technologists and technicians, winning 3 out of 4 metrics compared to Pasadena.

The salary gap between Pasadena and San Francisco is $11,893 (18.85%). San Francisco's median is +50.04% compared to the US national median of $49,986.

Salary Range Comparison

The full salary range (10th to 90th percentile) in Pasadena spans $39,797,San Francisco spans $27,272. Pasadena has a wider pay range, meaning more potential for high earners but also more variation.

Pasadena
P10 (Entry)$47,300
P25$51,354
Median$63,107
P75$78,777
P90 (Top)$87,097
San Francisco
P10 (Entry)$57,054
P25$64,038
Median$75,000
P75$78,513
P90 (Top)$84,326

Cost-of-Living Adjusted Comparison

After cost-of-living adjustment, San Francisco ($64,872 effective) pays 16.26% more than Pasadena ($55,798 effective).

Pasadena
Nominal: $63,107
CoL Index: 113.1
Adjusted: $55,798
San Francisco
Nominal: $75,000
CoL Index: 115.613
Adjusted: $64,872

Cost-of-living adjustment: salary × (100 / CoL index). Index of 100 = national average.

Which City Is Right for You?

Choose Pasadena if…

  • Better top-earner potential ($87,097)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Choose San Francisco if…

  • Higher median salary ($75,000/year)
  • Larger job market (1,220 employed)
  • Better purchasing power (CoL-adjusted: $64,872)
  • You prefer the California area and lifestyle

Historical Salary Growth Comparison

Based on BLS OEWS metropolitan area data, veterinary technologist and technician salaries in Pasadena grew 0.9% from 2024 to 2025, compared to 55.0% growth in San Francisco over the same period.

Pasadena, CA

+0.9%

$59,265 (2024) → $59,817 (2025)

San Francisco, CA

+55.0%

$45,870 (2019) → $71,090 (2025)

View Full Salary Data

Frequently Asked Questions

Which city pays veterinary technologist and technicians more: Pasadena or San Francisco?

San Francisco has a higher median veterinary technologist and technician salary at $75,000/year, compared to Pasadena at $63,107/year — a difference of $11,893 (18.85%).

What is the hourly rate difference between Pasadena and San Francisco?

Pasadena veterinary technologist and technicians earn $30.34/hr while San Francisco hygienists earn $36.06/hr (2026 est.).

Should I relocate from Pasadena to San Francisco as a veterinary technologist and technician?

Consider more than just salary when comparing Pasadena and San Francisco. Factor in cost of living (CoL-adjusted: Pasadena = $55,798, San Francisco = $64,872), job availability (35 vs 1,220 employed), commute, and career growth potential.

What do entry-level veterinary technologist and technicians earn in Pasadena vs San Francisco?

Entry-level (10th percentile) veterinary technologist and technicians earn $47,300 in Pasadena and $57,054 in San Francisco. The San Francisco area offers higher starting salaries.

Related Comparisons

JL

Written by Jordan Lee, CVT

Career Analyst

Jordan has 10 years of experience in veterinary technology. They specialize in emergency care. Jordan has worked in both clinic and hospital settings.

Clinically reviewed by Sofia Patel, RVTData verified by Mark Chen, LVT

Methodology & Data Source

All salary figures are 2026 projections based on BLS OEWS May 2025 data. A 5.50% CAGR (derived from 6-year national BLS trends) was applied to estimate current compensation. Cost-of-living adjustments use BEA Regional Price Parity data. Actual salaries vary by employer, certifications, and experience.

Data Sources & Methodology

Source: BLS, OEWS , released .

Compiled and verified by Jordan Lee, CVT, a licensed veterinary technologist and technician with 10+ years of clinical experience. · View source data at BLS.gov